Skip to content
AnalysisAnalysis

Gas turbines and engines at data centers: who is winning the on-site power orders

GE Vernova is named on 5.2 GW of units at power plants serving data centers, ahead of Bloom Energy and Siemens Energy. By maker, model, stage and state.

By SpeziaPublished Updated Data as of 8 min read

The short answer

Of the 24 power plants being built to serve U.S. data centers that Spezia found in permits, filings and announcements, GE Vernova is named on the most capacity: 5.2 GW of units at 6 plants, 4.4 GW of it operating or under construction. Bloom Energy (2.3 GW), Siemens Energy (1.2 GW) and Mitsubishi Power (0.9 GW) follow. No unit count by maker is on the record yet for 13.3 GW at 9 plants.

  • GE Vernova is named on 5.2 GW of units at 6 data center power plants, 45% of the capacity whose maker is named.
  • The 24 plants add up to 35.4 GW, but documents name the maker for only 11.7 GW of units. 9 plants with 13.3 GW have no unit count by maker yet.
  • Gas turbines are 153 named units and 8.7 GW. Gas engines are 197 units and 0.7 GW, and 7,000 fuel cells add 2.3 GW.
  • Texas holds 6 of the plants and 16.4 GW, 46% of the capacity.
  • Only 3 of the 24 plants could be matched to the federal inventory of generators, so most of this market does not show up there yet.

Ask Spezia about this

Free, with no account. Spezia answers from today's data with a source on every figure, and your conversation comes with you if you sign up.

5 free

Who makes the turbines at data centers' own power plants?

Some data centers cannot wait years for the grid, so power plants are being built to serve them directly, on site or under a dedicated arrangement. Spezia found 24 such plants in public documents as of November 13, 2026, with 35.4 GW of capacity. The documents name a maker for 11.7 GW of units, and GE Vernova leads by a wide margin.

Capacity named to each maker
  • GE Vernova5,192 MW

    6 plants

  • Bloom Energy2,275 MW

    1 plant

  • Siemens Energy1,212 MW

    5 plants

  • Mitsubishi Power906 MW

    1 plant

  • Solar Turbines797 MW

    4 plants

  • ProEnergy606 MW

    2 plants

  • Wärtsilä392 MW

    1 plant

  • INNIO Jenbacher212 MW

    1 plant

  • Caterpillar62 MW

    2 plants

Megawatts of units each maker is named on, all statuses. Source: Spezia on-site power tracker, November 13, 2026.

MakerCapacity namedUnitsPlantsOperating or under construction
GE Vernova5,192 MW6564,424 MW
Bloom Energy2,275 MW7,00010 MW
Siemens Energy1,212 MW395342 MW
Mitsubishi Power906 MW210 MW
Solar Turbines797 MW414414 MW
ProEnergy606 MW2620 MW
Wärtsilä392 MW4010 MW
INNIO Jenbacher212 MW13610 MW
Caterpillar62 MW2120 MW

Download this table as CSV

Units count every machine, so Bloom Energy's 7,000 fuel cells at a single plant outnumber everyone's turbines. Capacity is the fairer measure of an order book.

How far along are the plants?

Most of the capacity is not built yet. 2 plants with 2.0 GW are operating. 3 with 10.6 GW are under construction, and the rest is approved or only announced.

plants operating, 2.0 GW
2
under construction, 10.6 GW
3
approved, 6.5 GW
4
announced, 16.3 GW
15

By maker, the split shows who has machines in the ground and who has a pipeline:

MakerOperatingUnder constructionApprovedAnnounced
GE Vernova1,601 MW2,823 MWNone768 MW
Bloom EnergyNoneNoneNone2,275 MW
Siemens EnergyNone342 MW556 MW314 MW
Mitsubishi PowerNoneNoneNone906 MW
Solar Turbines414 MWNone218 MW165 MW
ProEnergyNoneNoneNone606 MW
WärtsiläNoneNoneNone392 MW
INNIO JenbacherNoneNoneNone212 MW
CaterpillarNoneNone47 MW15 MW

Download this table as CSV

GE Vernova has the most capacity operating or under construction: 1,601 MW operating and 2,823 MW under construction. A plant's stage comes from a quote in its own documents for 18 of the 24 plants. The other 6 have no such quote and count as announced.

Which turbine and engine models are going in?

Here is every model the documents name, by capacity.

ModelTypeUnitsCapacityPlants
GE Vernova 7HA.02Gas turbine93,456 MW2
Bloom Energy Energy ServerFuel cell7,0002,275 MW1
GE Vernova LM2500XPRESSGas turbine291,015 MW1
Siemens Energy SGT-800Gas turbine17980 MW3
Mitsubishi Power M501JACGas turbine2906 MW1
ProEnergy LM6000Gas turbine13606 MW1
GE Vernova TM2500Gas turbine12415 MW1
Wärtsilä 34SGGas engine40392 MW1
Solar Turbines Titan 130Gas turbine19314 MW2
Solar Turbines SMT-130Gas turbine14224 MW1
INNIO Jenbacher J420Gas engine136212 MW1
Solar Turbines Titan 350Gas turbine5190 MW1
GE Vernova LM2500Gas turbine5171 MW1
GE Vernova 6BGas turbine3135 MW1
Siemens Energy SGT-400Gas turbine9129 MW2
Siemens Energy SGT-A35Gas turbine3104 MW1
Solar Turbines Titan 250Gas turbine369 MW1
Caterpillar G3520Gas engine2162 MW2
ProEnergy Model not namedNot stated13Not stated1
Siemens Energy SGT6-5000FGas turbine10Not stated2
GE Vernova 7HANot stated7Not stated1

Download this table as CSV

Where a model's capacity says not stated, no document gave its megawatts per unit and Spezia has no checked rating for that exact model, so its units count but add nothing to the totals.

Gas turbines, engines or fuel cells?

Turbines, by capacity. Named gas turbines total 8.7 GW in 153 units. Reciprocating gas engines total 666 MW in 197 units, and fuel cells 2.3 GW in 7,000 units at one site.

Engines are smaller machines, so a plant needs more of them for the same output. A sales team selling engines will see more units and fewer megawatts per order than one selling turbines.

The largest on-site plants, and whose units are in them

Each plant below names at least one maker. Where a document's stated total and the units' rated total differ, both are shown: a stated total is often net output or only the first phase, and the totals above count the larger of the two.

PlantStateStatusCapacityUnits namedSource
Project MatadorTexasUnder construction6.0 GW stated; units rated 477 MW6 Siemens Energy SGT-800, 3 GE Vernova 6B and 3 Siemens Energy SGT6-5000FCompany
Homer City Energy CampusPennsylvaniaUnder construction4.5 GW stated; units rated 2.7 GW7 GE Vernova 7HA.02Company
Project JupiterNew MexicoAnnounced2.5 GW stated; units rated 2.3 GW7,000 Bloom Energy Energy ServerReport
Longhorn Data CenterTexasOperating1.0 GW stated; units rated 1.4 GW29 GE Vernova LM2500XPRESS, 5 Solar Turbines Titan 350, 5 GE Vernova LM2500 and 13 ProEnergyReport
Cheyenne Power HubWyomingAnnounced1.2 GW stated; units rated 906 MW2 Mitsubishi Power M501JACCompany
Victoria projectTexasAnnounced768 MW2 GE Vernova 7HA.02Report
Colossus Gas PlantMississippiOperating495 MW stated; units rated 639 MW12 GE Vernova TM2500 and 14 Solar Turbines SMT-130Report
Goodnight Data CenterTexasAnnounced606 MW13 ProEnergy LM6000Report
ASR-IXNevadaApproved513 MW9 Siemens Energy SGT-800Report
Apollo Power Generation FacilityOhioAnnounced350 MW stated; units rated 495 MW10 Solar Turbines Titan 130, 2 Siemens Energy SGT-800, 3 Siemens Energy SGT-A35, 6 Siemens Energy SGT-400 and 6 Caterpillar G3520Filing
Unnamed plantOhioAnnounced412 MW40 Wärtsilä 34SGCompany
Socrates South Power Generation ProjectOhioApproved200 MW stated; units rated 307 MW9 Solar Turbines Titan 130, 3 Solar Turbines Titan 250, 15 Caterpillar G3520 and 3 Siemens Energy SGT-400Report
Peru Ridge Self-Generation ProjectNevadaAnnounced218 MW136 INNIO Jenbacher J420Report
East MicrogridNew MexicoAnnouncedNot stated7 Siemens Energy SGT6-5000FPermit file

Download this table as CSV

9 more plants, with 13.3 GW, have a stated size but no count of units by maker in the documents Spezia has read (a document may name a supplier without a count). They are where the next orders are still open. These 7 have a source that is not a repost:

PlantStateStatusCapacitySource
R.M. Schahfer Generating StationIndianaAnnounced2.6 GWSource
Monarch Cloud CampusWest VirginiaAnnounced2.2 GWSource
Fairfield Energy CenterOhioAnnounced1.4 GWSource
Cheyenne Fuel CellWyomingAnnounced702 MWSource
Project BaccaraArizonaApproved700 MWSource
Socrates the YoungerOhioAnnounced250 MWSource
VoltaGrid power plantGeorgiaUnder construction90 MWSource

Download this table as CSV

Where are these plants being built?

Texas leads by far: 6 plants with 16.4 GW. Each state links to its data center tracker page.

StatePlantsCapacityUnits named
Texas616.4 GW86
Pennsylvania14.5 GW7
Ohio63.2 GW97
Indiana12.6 GW0
New Mexico22.5 GW7,007
West Virginia12.2 GW0
Wyoming21.9 GW2
Nevada2731 MW145
Arizona1700 MW0
Mississippi1639 MW26
Georgia190 MW0

Download this table as CSV

For the grid side of the same story, read power plants planned near data centers and the gigawatt power wall. For when the equipment packages are bought, read the procurement timeline for trade and equipment sellers.

How does this compare with the federal inventory?

The U.S. Energy Information Administration's monthly inventory of generators at plants of 1 MW or more (EIA-860M, September 2026 edition) includes the ones owners report as planned. Only 3 of the 24 on-site plants could be matched to it by name and state, so most of this market is not in the federal data yet.

Planned gas technologyPlantsCapacityWithin 40 km of a tracked data center
Gas combustion turbines5623.0 GW11.7 GW at 23 plants
Gas engines14952 MW251 MW at 7 plants
Gas combined cycle3747.1 GW23.3 GW at 11 plants

Download this table as CSV

About half of planned gas turbine capacity, 51%, sits within 40 km of a data center project Spezia tracks. Near is a distance, not proof that a plant serves the data center.

How Spezia counts, and what it leaves out

  • Every unit has a quote. A count is kept only when its document states it and names the maker or model. A size is never read as a count: "320 MW of turbines" is not 320 turbines.
  • No double counting. Documents about one plant are merged into one record, and each model is counted once, from the strongest and newest document. Other counts stay visible: documents disagree on 4 unit lines.
  • Megawatts. 97 units carry the document's own rating and 7,243 use the maker's published rating. 30 have neither and count as units only.
  • Partly named plants. 7 plants state a total larger than their named units, usually because only the first phase's machines are public.
  • Left out. Backup diesel generators, plants that only serve the grid, and nuclear plans that name no machine. 3 plants with 1.1 GW are left out because no document has mentioned them in the past year: some may have been withdrawn.
  • Stages. A stage needs a quote about the plant itself. Approved means a regulator or local board approved the plant or issued a permit for it; a draft permit or an application is not enough. 6 plants have no such quote and count as announced.

What should equipment sales teams do with this?

  • Turbine makers. 13.3 GW at 9 plants has no unit count by maker yet. Those permits and filings are the first place to look.
  • Engine and fuel cell makers. The units are small, so the count per site is high. Watch the permit applications, which list every unit.
  • Distributors and contractors. 12.6 GW is operating or under construction. Each of those plants also needs switchgear, transformers and controls.
  • Lenders and investors. Check each plant's status quote before you count its capacity: 16.3 GW is only announced.

See every plant with its units by maker and model, the permit or filing behind each count, and the data center it powers.

Open on-site power

Get the week in data center construction, every Tuesday

Free. New projects, stage changes, contract awards, power deals and local opposition across the U.S., each with its source, plus the projects that moved on Spezia's tracker. One click to unsubscribe.

How this was made

Spezia's on-site power tracker searches air permits, permit applications, regulator filings, company announcements and the trade press for power plants built to serve a data center on site or under a dedicated arrangement. A unit counts only when its document states the count and names the maker or model, with the quote kept. Reposts rank below the outlet that reported first. Backup diesel generators are left out. Unit megawatts are the document's own figure where it gives one, otherwise the maker's published rating. A plant counts once, at the larger of its units' total and the total a document states. A stage needs a quote about the plant itself: approved means a regulator or board approved it or issued its permit. Plants no document has mentioned in a year are left out. Read on November 13, 2026.

The data was read on November 13, 2026. Figures change as new research lands, and this post is updated when they do.

Sources

  1. On-site power tracker, Spezia
  2. Preliminary Monthly Electric Generator Inventory (EIA-860M), September 2026, U.S. Energy Information Administration
  3. EIA-860M September 2026 spreadsheet, U.S. Energy Information Administration
  4. Fermi America™ Secures Final 6GW Clean Air Permit from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) for World's Largest 11 GW Private Power Grid - Fermi America™ Secures Final 6GW Clean Air Pe, nasdaq.com
  5. PRESS RELEASE: Homer City Redevelopment and Kiewit Announce Country’s Largest Natural Gas-Powered Data Center Campus to Support AI and HPC Demand, homercityredevelopment.com
  6. Project Jupiter permit application public hearing scheduled for December, star-telegram.com
  7. Parker Hannifin Powering Up Data Center Mega Development, automation.com
  8. Tallgrass and Mitsubishi Power Americas Announce Turbine Allocation for Cheyenne Power Hub - May 15, 2026 9:45 AM Eastern Daylight Time, secure.businesswire.com
  9. Texas 2.5-GW Gas-Plus-Nuclear Project Proceeds to Engineering, Licensing Phase, powermag.com
  10. Judge derails xAI bid to dismiss data center turbine case, techtarget.com
  11. Cliff: Texas air-permit decision tree for data-center power, cliffcenter.com

Common questions

Who makes the gas turbines for data centers?

In Spezia's on-site power tracker, GE Vernova is named on the most capacity, 5.2 GW of units at 6 plants. Bloom Energy, Siemens Energy, Mitsubishi Power and Solar Turbines follow. Counts come from permits, filings and announcements as of November 13, 2026.

How many data centers are building their own power plants?

Spezia has found 24 power plants in the U.S. built to serve a data center on site or under a dedicated arrangement, with 35.4 GW of capacity. 2 are operating and 3 are under construction.

Do data centers use gas turbines or reciprocating engines?

Mostly turbines by capacity. Named gas turbines total 8.7 GW in 153 units, against 666 MW in 197 gas engines. Fuel cells add 2.3 GW at one site.

What is behind-the-meter power for a data center?

Power generated on or next to the site for the data center itself, rather than bought from the grid. It is used when the grid connection will take years, as a bridge until it arrives, or as the main supply.

Does EIA list data center power plants?

Only some. Of the 24 on-site plants Spezia tracks, 3 could be matched by name and state to EIA-860M, the federal monthly inventory of generators at plants of 1 MW or more. Plants that do not report to it, or report under another name, are missing there.

Cite this

Spezia. "Gas turbines and engines at data centers: who is winning the on-site power orders" Spezia, November 13, 2026. https://spezia.ai/blog/data-center-gas-turbines-by-maker

You may quote and share this analysis with a link to the post. Plain-text version · RSS

Keep reading

Work with this data yourself

The numbers in this post come from tools you can open right now, without an account. Ask your own question, filter to your states, and open the sources.

  • Data centers' own power plants, with every turbine and engine by maker and model.

    See it live
  • Planned plants, the grid connection queues and the power gap in each state.

    See it live
  • 800+ U.S. data center projects: who is involved and which trades are buying now.

    See it live

See which data centers build their own power plants, and whose turbines are inside.

Open it now with today's data, no account needed. Sign up free when you want to keep going. No card.