The short answer
Of the 24 power plants being built to serve U.S. data centers that Spezia found in permits, filings and announcements, GE Vernova is named on the most capacity: 5.2 GW of units at 6 plants, 4.4 GW of it operating or under construction. Bloom Energy (2.3 GW), Siemens Energy (1.2 GW) and Mitsubishi Power (0.9 GW) follow. No unit count by maker is on the record yet for 13.3 GW at 9 plants.
- GE Vernova is named on 5.2 GW of units at 6 data center power plants, 45% of the capacity whose maker is named.
- The 24 plants add up to 35.4 GW, but documents name the maker for only 11.7 GW of units. 9 plants with 13.3 GW have no unit count by maker yet.
- Gas turbines are 153 named units and 8.7 GW. Gas engines are 197 units and 0.7 GW, and 7,000 fuel cells add 2.3 GW.
- Texas holds 6 of the plants and 16.4 GW, 46% of the capacity.
- Only 3 of the 24 plants could be matched to the federal inventory of generators, so most of this market does not show up there yet.
Ask Spezia about this
Free, with no account. Spezia answers from today's data with a source on every figure, and your conversation comes with you if you sign up.
Who makes the turbines at data centers' own power plants?
Some data centers cannot wait years for the grid, so power plants are being built to serve them directly, on site or under a dedicated arrangement. Spezia found 24 such plants in public documents as of November 13, 2026, with 35.4 GW of capacity. The documents name a maker for 11.7 GW of units, and GE Vernova leads by a wide margin.
- GE Vernova5,192 MW
6 plants
- Bloom Energy2,275 MW
1 plant
- Siemens Energy1,212 MW
5 plants
- Mitsubishi Power906 MW
1 plant
- Solar Turbines797 MW
4 plants
- ProEnergy606 MW
2 plants
- Wärtsilä392 MW
1 plant
- INNIO Jenbacher212 MW
1 plant
- Caterpillar62 MW
2 plants
Megawatts of units each maker is named on, all statuses. Source: Spezia on-site power tracker, November 13, 2026.
| Maker | Capacity named | Units | Plants | Operating or under construction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GE Vernova | 5,192 MW | 65 | 6 | 4,424 MW |
| Bloom Energy | 2,275 MW | 7,000 | 1 | 0 MW |
| Siemens Energy | 1,212 MW | 39 | 5 | 342 MW |
| Mitsubishi Power | 906 MW | 2 | 1 | 0 MW |
| Solar Turbines | 797 MW | 41 | 4 | 414 MW |
| ProEnergy | 606 MW | 26 | 2 | 0 MW |
| Wärtsilä | 392 MW | 40 | 1 | 0 MW |
| INNIO Jenbacher | 212 MW | 136 | 1 | 0 MW |
| Caterpillar | 62 MW | 21 | 2 | 0 MW |
Units count every machine, so Bloom Energy's 7,000 fuel cells at a single plant outnumber everyone's turbines. Capacity is the fairer measure of an order book.
How far along are the plants?
Most of the capacity is not built yet. 2 plants with 2.0 GW are operating. 3 with 10.6 GW are under construction, and the rest is approved or only announced.
- plants operating, 2.0 GW
- 2
- under construction, 10.6 GW
- 3
- approved, 6.5 GW
- 4
- announced, 16.3 GW
- 15
By maker, the split shows who has machines in the ground and who has a pipeline:
| Maker | Operating | Under construction | Approved | Announced |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GE Vernova | 1,601 MW | 2,823 MW | None | 768 MW |
| Bloom Energy | None | None | None | 2,275 MW |
| Siemens Energy | None | 342 MW | 556 MW | 314 MW |
| Mitsubishi Power | None | None | None | 906 MW |
| Solar Turbines | 414 MW | None | 218 MW | 165 MW |
| ProEnergy | None | None | None | 606 MW |
| Wärtsilä | None | None | None | 392 MW |
| INNIO Jenbacher | None | None | None | 212 MW |
| Caterpillar | None | None | 47 MW | 15 MW |
GE Vernova has the most capacity operating or under construction: 1,601 MW operating and 2,823 MW under construction. A plant's stage comes from a quote in its own documents for 18 of the 24 plants. The other 6 have no such quote and count as announced.
Which turbine and engine models are going in?
Here is every model the documents name, by capacity.
| Model | Type | Units | Capacity | Plants |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GE Vernova 7HA.02 | Gas turbine | 9 | 3,456 MW | 2 |
| Bloom Energy Energy Server | Fuel cell | 7,000 | 2,275 MW | 1 |
| GE Vernova LM2500XPRESS | Gas turbine | 29 | 1,015 MW | 1 |
| Siemens Energy SGT-800 | Gas turbine | 17 | 980 MW | 3 |
| Mitsubishi Power M501JAC | Gas turbine | 2 | 906 MW | 1 |
| ProEnergy LM6000 | Gas turbine | 13 | 606 MW | 1 |
| GE Vernova TM2500 | Gas turbine | 12 | 415 MW | 1 |
| Wärtsilä 34SG | Gas engine | 40 | 392 MW | 1 |
| Solar Turbines Titan 130 | Gas turbine | 19 | 314 MW | 2 |
| Solar Turbines SMT-130 | Gas turbine | 14 | 224 MW | 1 |
| INNIO Jenbacher J420 | Gas engine | 136 | 212 MW | 1 |
| Solar Turbines Titan 350 | Gas turbine | 5 | 190 MW | 1 |
| GE Vernova LM2500 | Gas turbine | 5 | 171 MW | 1 |
| GE Vernova 6B | Gas turbine | 3 | 135 MW | 1 |
| Siemens Energy SGT-400 | Gas turbine | 9 | 129 MW | 2 |
| Siemens Energy SGT-A35 | Gas turbine | 3 | 104 MW | 1 |
| Solar Turbines Titan 250 | Gas turbine | 3 | 69 MW | 1 |
| Caterpillar G3520 | Gas engine | 21 | 62 MW | 2 |
| ProEnergy Model not named | Not stated | 13 | Not stated | 1 |
| Siemens Energy SGT6-5000F | Gas turbine | 10 | Not stated | 2 |
| GE Vernova 7HA | Not stated | 7 | Not stated | 1 |
Where a model's capacity says not stated, no document gave its megawatts per unit and Spezia has no checked rating for that exact model, so its units count but add nothing to the totals.
Gas turbines, engines or fuel cells?
Turbines, by capacity. Named gas turbines total 8.7 GW in 153 units. Reciprocating gas engines total 666 MW in 197 units, and fuel cells 2.3 GW in 7,000 units at one site.
Engines are smaller machines, so a plant needs more of them for the same output. A sales team selling engines will see more units and fewer megawatts per order than one selling turbines.
The largest on-site plants, and whose units are in them
Each plant below names at least one maker. Where a document's stated total and the units' rated total differ, both are shown: a stated total is often net output or only the first phase, and the totals above count the larger of the two.
| Plant | State | Status | Capacity | Units named | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project Matador | Texas | Under construction | 6.0 GW stated; units rated 477 MW | 6 Siemens Energy SGT-800, 3 GE Vernova 6B and 3 Siemens Energy SGT6-5000F | Company |
| Homer City Energy Campus | Pennsylvania | Under construction | 4.5 GW stated; units rated 2.7 GW | 7 GE Vernova 7HA.02 | Company |
| Project Jupiter | New Mexico | Announced | 2.5 GW stated; units rated 2.3 GW | 7,000 Bloom Energy Energy Server | Report |
| Longhorn Data Center | Texas | Operating | 1.0 GW stated; units rated 1.4 GW | 29 GE Vernova LM2500XPRESS, 5 Solar Turbines Titan 350, 5 GE Vernova LM2500 and 13 ProEnergy | Report |
| Cheyenne Power Hub | Wyoming | Announced | 1.2 GW stated; units rated 906 MW | 2 Mitsubishi Power M501JAC | Company |
| Victoria project | Texas | Announced | 768 MW | 2 GE Vernova 7HA.02 | Report |
| Colossus Gas Plant | Mississippi | Operating | 495 MW stated; units rated 639 MW | 12 GE Vernova TM2500 and 14 Solar Turbines SMT-130 | Report |
| Goodnight Data Center | Texas | Announced | 606 MW | 13 ProEnergy LM6000 | Report |
| ASR-IX | Nevada | Approved | 513 MW | 9 Siemens Energy SGT-800 | Report |
| Apollo Power Generation Facility | Ohio | Announced | 350 MW stated; units rated 495 MW | 10 Solar Turbines Titan 130, 2 Siemens Energy SGT-800, 3 Siemens Energy SGT-A35, 6 Siemens Energy SGT-400 and 6 Caterpillar G3520 | Filing |
| Unnamed plant | Ohio | Announced | 412 MW | 40 Wärtsilä 34SG | Company |
| Socrates South Power Generation Project | Ohio | Approved | 200 MW stated; units rated 307 MW | 9 Solar Turbines Titan 130, 3 Solar Turbines Titan 250, 15 Caterpillar G3520 and 3 Siemens Energy SGT-400 | Report |
| Peru Ridge Self-Generation Project | Nevada | Announced | 218 MW | 136 INNIO Jenbacher J420 | Report |
| East Microgrid | New Mexico | Announced | Not stated | 7 Siemens Energy SGT6-5000F | Permit file |
9 more plants, with 13.3 GW, have a stated size but no count of units by maker in the documents Spezia has read (a document may name a supplier without a count). They are where the next orders are still open. These 7 have a source that is not a repost:
| Plant | State | Status | Capacity | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R.M. Schahfer Generating Station | Indiana | Announced | 2.6 GW | Source |
| Monarch Cloud Campus | West Virginia | Announced | 2.2 GW | Source |
| Fairfield Energy Center | Ohio | Announced | 1.4 GW | Source |
| Cheyenne Fuel Cell | Wyoming | Announced | 702 MW | Source |
| Project Baccara | Arizona | Approved | 700 MW | Source |
| Socrates the Younger | Ohio | Announced | 250 MW | Source |
| VoltaGrid power plant | Georgia | Under construction | 90 MW | Source |
Where are these plants being built?
Texas leads by far: 6 plants with 16.4 GW. Each state links to its data center tracker page.
| State | Plants | Capacity | Units named |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas | 6 | 16.4 GW | 86 |
| Pennsylvania | 1 | 4.5 GW | 7 |
| Ohio | 6 | 3.2 GW | 97 |
| Indiana | 1 | 2.6 GW | 0 |
| New Mexico | 2 | 2.5 GW | 7,007 |
| West Virginia | 1 | 2.2 GW | 0 |
| Wyoming | 2 | 1.9 GW | 2 |
| Nevada | 2 | 731 MW | 145 |
| Arizona | 1 | 700 MW | 0 |
| Mississippi | 1 | 639 MW | 26 |
| Georgia | 1 | 90 MW | 0 |
For the grid side of the same story, read power plants planned near data centers and the gigawatt power wall. For when the equipment packages are bought, read the procurement timeline for trade and equipment sellers.
How does this compare with the federal inventory?
The U.S. Energy Information Administration's monthly inventory of generators at plants of 1 MW or more (EIA-860M, September 2026 edition) includes the ones owners report as planned. Only 3 of the 24 on-site plants could be matched to it by name and state, so most of this market is not in the federal data yet.
| Planned gas technology | Plants | Capacity | Within 40 km of a tracked data center |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gas combustion turbines | 56 | 23.0 GW | 11.7 GW at 23 plants |
| Gas engines | 14 | 952 MW | 251 MW at 7 plants |
| Gas combined cycle | 37 | 47.1 GW | 23.3 GW at 11 plants |
About half of planned gas turbine capacity, 51%, sits within 40 km of a data center project Spezia tracks. Near is a distance, not proof that a plant serves the data center.
How Spezia counts, and what it leaves out
- Every unit has a quote. A count is kept only when its document states it and names the maker or model. A size is never read as a count: "320 MW of turbines" is not 320 turbines.
- No double counting. Documents about one plant are merged into one record, and each model is counted once, from the strongest and newest document. Other counts stay visible: documents disagree on 4 unit lines.
- Megawatts. 97 units carry the document's own rating and 7,243 use the maker's published rating. 30 have neither and count as units only.
- Partly named plants. 7 plants state a total larger than their named units, usually because only the first phase's machines are public.
- Left out. Backup diesel generators, plants that only serve the grid, and nuclear plans that name no machine. 3 plants with 1.1 GW are left out because no document has mentioned them in the past year: some may have been withdrawn.
- Stages. A stage needs a quote about the plant itself. Approved means a regulator or local board approved the plant or issued a permit for it; a draft permit or an application is not enough. 6 plants have no such quote and count as announced.
What should equipment sales teams do with this?
- Turbine makers. 13.3 GW at 9 plants has no unit count by maker yet. Those permits and filings are the first place to look.
- Engine and fuel cell makers. The units are small, so the count per site is high. Watch the permit applications, which list every unit.
- Distributors and contractors. 12.6 GW is operating or under construction. Each of those plants also needs switchgear, transformers and controls.
- Lenders and investors. Check each plant's status quote before you count its capacity: 16.3 GW is only announced.
See every plant with its units by maker and model, the permit or filing behind each count, and the data center it powers.
Open on-site powerGet the week in data center construction, every Tuesday
Free. New projects, stage changes, contract awards, power deals and local opposition across the U.S., each with its source, plus the projects that moved on Spezia's tracker. One click to unsubscribe.
How this was made
Spezia's on-site power tracker searches air permits, permit applications, regulator filings, company announcements and the trade press for power plants built to serve a data center on site or under a dedicated arrangement. A unit counts only when its document states the count and names the maker or model, with the quote kept. Reposts rank below the outlet that reported first. Backup diesel generators are left out. Unit megawatts are the document's own figure where it gives one, otherwise the maker's published rating. A plant counts once, at the larger of its units' total and the total a document states. A stage needs a quote about the plant itself: approved means a regulator or board approved it or issued its permit. Plants no document has mentioned in a year are left out. Read on November 13, 2026.
The data was read on November 13, 2026. Figures change as new research lands, and this post is updated when they do.
Sources
- On-site power tracker, Spezia
- Preliminary Monthly Electric Generator Inventory (EIA-860M), September 2026, U.S. Energy Information Administration
- EIA-860M September 2026 spreadsheet, U.S. Energy Information Administration
- Fermi America™ Secures Final 6GW Clean Air Permit from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) for World's Largest 11 GW Private Power Grid - Fermi America™ Secures Final 6GW Clean Air Pe, nasdaq.com
- PRESS RELEASE: Homer City Redevelopment and Kiewit Announce Country’s Largest Natural Gas-Powered Data Center Campus to Support AI and HPC Demand, homercityredevelopment.com
- Project Jupiter permit application public hearing scheduled for December, star-telegram.com
- Parker Hannifin Powering Up Data Center Mega Development, automation.com
- Tallgrass and Mitsubishi Power Americas Announce Turbine Allocation for Cheyenne Power Hub - May 15, 2026 9:45 AM Eastern Daylight Time, secure.businesswire.com
- Texas 2.5-GW Gas-Plus-Nuclear Project Proceeds to Engineering, Licensing Phase, powermag.com
- Judge derails xAI bid to dismiss data center turbine case, techtarget.com
- Cliff: Texas air-permit decision tree for data-center power, cliffcenter.com
Common questions
Who makes the gas turbines for data centers?
In Spezia's on-site power tracker, GE Vernova is named on the most capacity, 5.2 GW of units at 6 plants. Bloom Energy, Siemens Energy, Mitsubishi Power and Solar Turbines follow. Counts come from permits, filings and announcements as of November 13, 2026.
How many data centers are building their own power plants?
Spezia has found 24 power plants in the U.S. built to serve a data center on site or under a dedicated arrangement, with 35.4 GW of capacity. 2 are operating and 3 are under construction.
Do data centers use gas turbines or reciprocating engines?
Mostly turbines by capacity. Named gas turbines total 8.7 GW in 153 units, against 666 MW in 197 gas engines. Fuel cells add 2.3 GW at one site.
What is behind-the-meter power for a data center?
Power generated on or next to the site for the data center itself, rather than bought from the grid. It is used when the grid connection will take years, as a bridge until it arrives, or as the main supply.
Does EIA list data center power plants?
Only some. Of the 24 on-site plants Spezia tracks, 3 could be matched by name and state to EIA-860M, the federal monthly inventory of generators at plants of 1 MW or more. Plants that do not report to it, or report under another name, are missing there.
Cite this
Spezia. "Gas turbines and engines at data centers: who is winning the on-site power orders" Spezia, November 13, 2026. https://spezia.ai/blog/data-center-gas-turbines-by-maker
You may quote and share this analysis with a link to the post. Plain-text version · RSS